MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Permselective Membranes for Gas Processing Replacing the Conventional Methods

2016· article· en· W2624087085 on OpenAlexaff
K. C. Khulbe, Takeshi Matsuura, Chenxi Feng

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical Engineering Research Updates · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMembrane Separation and Gas Transport
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMembraneSyngasNatural-gas processingMembrane technologyWaste managementNatural gasProcess engineeringBiogasGas separationSour gasPolymeric membraneSweeteningEngineeringMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceChemistryCatalysisOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Membrane technology has gained acceptance for gas separation and recovery as membranes are friendly to the environment and less expensive. Membranes are starting to play a great role in industries such as separation and production of gases, sweetening of natural gas, processing of biogas and syngas, and oil refineries. This article evaluates the replacement of the conventional methods for gas processing by perm selective membranes and also offers an overview of the membrane technology in current use for gas processing in industries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.639
Threshold uncertainty score0.287

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical Engineering Research UpdatesSame topicMembrane Separation and Gas TransportFrench-language works237,207