MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2624111688 · doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b00904

Crystal Structures of CaB<sub>3</sub>N<sub>3</sub> at High Pressures

2017· article· en· W2624111688 on OpenAlexaff
Miao Zhang, Yanan Guo, Li Zhu, Xiaolei Feng, Simon A. T. Redfern, Jiuhua Chen, Hanyu Liu, John S. Tse

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicInorganic Chemistry and Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersBasic Energy SciencesEducation Department of Jilin ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsChemistryTernary operationCrystal structureCrystal structure predictionHigh pressureStructural stabilitySemimetalPhase (matter)CrystallographySemiconductorSpace (punctuation)Band gapElectronic structurePhononCrystal (programming language)Condensed matter physicsThermodynamicsComputational chemistryPhysicsOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Using global structure searches, we have explored the structural stability of CaB3N3, a compound analogous to CaC6, under pressure. There are two high-pressure phases with space groups R3c and Amm2 that were found to be stable between 29 and 42 GPa, and above 42 GPa, respectively. The two phases show different structural frameworks, analogous to graphitic CaC6. Phonon calculations confirm that both structures are also dynamically stable at high pressures. The electronic structure calculations show that the R3c phase is a semiconductor with a band gap of 2.21 eV and that the Amm2 phase is a semimetal. These findings help advance our understanding of the Ca–B–N ternary system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInorganic ChemistrySame topicInorganic Chemistry and MaterialsFrench-language works237,207