MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2624149176 · doi:10.4000/vertigo.18547

Les titres fonciers autour de Bamako : modes d’accès et impacts sur les usages

2017· article· fr· W2624149176 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fatoumata Camara

Bibliographic record

VenueVertigO · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Rural Development Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForestryGeographyHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans les communes environnantes de Bamako, les ressources naturelles, particulièrement les terres agricoles, sont soumises à une forte pression. Celle-ci se manifeste par une augmentation croissante du nombre de titres fonciers (TF) pendant ces dernières années. Les communes périurbaines de Bamako comptaient en décembre 2010 43 694 TF avec une superficie de 56 164 hectares, 83 ares et 59 centiares. L’augmentation significative des TF profite peu ou pas à la production agricole. Les usages de la terre étant constamment modifiés, les terres acquises par les nouveaux acquéreurs (les Bamakois) sont utilisées dans la plupart des cas comme un moyen de thésaurisation foncière pour de futurs terrains d’habitations. C’est ainsi qu’environ 70 % des TF ont vocation d’habitation. L’approvisionnement des populations bamakoises en céréales et légumes, que les paysans assuraient tant bien que mal, se détériore, anéantissant les effets bénéfiques d’une sécurisation foncière par voie d’immatriculation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVertigOSame topicAgriculture and Rural Development ResearchFrench-language works237,207