A Portable Display for Evaluating Handling Qualities in Shipboard Hover
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A limited flight test assessment of a portable display for evaluating handling qualities in shipboard hover was performed. The Portable Optical Navigation Guidance (PONG) display is intended as a land-based component for replicating the control motions required for hovering over the deck of a small ship. It is based on the Canadian National Research Council's Flight Research Laboratory's Superslide display. A U.S. Marine Corps fleet-configured Bell UH-1N, used by the U.S. Naval Air Warfare Center's Naval Aviation Center for Rotorcraft Advancement organization, was flown by three pilots, all with recent shipboard experience, to assess the fidelity of PONG for varying forcing function intensity levels (Sea States). In this limited assessment, the pilots' comments about PONG were generally not as favorable as those given by other pilots for the NRC's Superslide. While the flight program did not provide an opportunity to identify the differences in configurations, possible reasons for the differences in pilot opinion are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it