MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2624340718 · doi:10.1121/1.4988587

Transmission of side-scan sonar snippets from an underway unmanned underwater vehicle

2017· article· en· W2624340718 on OpenAlexaff
Mae Seto, Alice Danckaers

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSonarUnderwaterComputer scienceUnmanned underwater vehicleVector quantizationQuantization (signal processing)Artificial intelligenceComputer visionSide-scan sonarMarine engineeringTransmitterGeologyTelecommunicationsEngineeringOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An unique vector quantization compression methodology was applied to compress and encode side-scan sonar snippets of mine-like objects generated by automated target recognition tools on-board underway unmanned underwater vehicles (UUV). These compressed and encoded images were then further formed into acoustic packets. The objective was to transmit these acoustic packets, underwater, as representations of the sonar snippets (mugshots). The ability to transmit sonar snippets underwater while the UUV is underway is important as it allows the above-water operator to examine an image of mine-like objects, without recovering the UUV, for a timely decision on whether the object is actually a mine. This vector quantization method was used because of its terseness and thus it could be transmitted by WHOI underwater micromodems integrated on IVER3 UUVs. This presentation describes the algorithm, its implementation, and its initial in-water validation in local waters. This capability was also validated and demonstrated during the Royal Navy Unmanned Warrior 2016 exercise. Results from this will also be presented and discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.686
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207