MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2624372292

Correlations between attendance in a youth diabetes education program and risk for type 2 diabetes

2014· article· en· W2624372292 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nathan Hall, Robert Pryce, Jacqueline Hay, Gerren K. McDonald, Danielle Stringer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Management and Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttendancePsychological interventionGerontologyMedicineAnthropometryType 2 diabetesEnvironmental healthRisk perceptionPsychologyPerceptionDiabetes mellitusNursing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) on the rise, expert panels have called for studies examining the effectiveness of primary prevention programs, and suggest targeting high risk populations (Alberti, 2007). Manitoban youth have incidence rates of T2DM 20 times greater than other provinces (Amed et al., 2010). Physical activity and diet are important modifiable factors to reduce T2DM risk (Huang et al., 2003). However, a review of previous community based interventions addressing modifiable risk in youth demonstrated a paucity of evidence exists (Satterfield et al., 2003). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the change in modifiable risk factors (physical activity, nutrition and health attitudes) and perceived risk among inner city youth who participate in a T2DM awareness and education program. Participants in this study were 47 inner city secondary school students (M=24, F=23). They participated in an 8 week T2DM awareness and education program focusing on physical activity and nutrition. The Risk Perception Survey for Developing Diabetes was used to assess perceived risk of developing T2DM (Walker et al., 2009). The PACE Adolescent Stages-of-Change Measures were used to measure activity perceptions and attitudes (Norman et al., 2005). Participant demographics and anthropometrics were also obtained. Pre and post data was collected. A correlation was found to exist between participant attendance in the program and both post program optimistic bias (r = 0.296) and change in optimistic bias (r = 0.515) regarding their risk to develop T2DM, however no correlation was found between attendance and perceived control of risk for T2DM. A general upward trend was also found for stages of change based on the pre and post PACE questionnaire results (e.g., pre = 40% vs. post = 17% in contemplation; pre = 15% vs. post = 32% in action). Reasons for these findings and practical implications will be discussed.Acknowledgments: Sun Life Financial Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDiabetes Management and Education→French-language works237,207→