Evaluation of a Horizontal Air Flow In-Bin Grain Drying System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Drying is the major post-harvest operation carried out to reduce the moisture content of harvested grains to increase storage period and reduce storage losses. A prototype horizontal airflow in-bin drying system was developed and evaluated for drying wheat. The results proved that the moisture front moved radially from the center to the sidewall of the bin throughout the grain bulk and there were no significant differences (p<0.05) in drying at the bottom, middle, and top layers of the grain bulk when the airflow control valve was set at 2 m (equal to radius of the bin) from the top surface of the grain bulk. When the airflow control valve was set at 4 m (diameter of the bin), there were significant differences among the drying patterns at the three different heights. The results of the air pressure measurements showed that the air pressure distribution was equal around the radius of the bin. These results indicated that the current prototype dried the grain evenly from bottom to top of the grain bulk and can be used effectively at commercial level to dry grain in hopper bottom bins (tested) as well as in flat-bottom bins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".