MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2624481963

Bicultural Stress and Disordered Eating in Arab-Canadian Women: Clarifying the Roles of Acculturation, Ethnic Identity, Acculturative Distress and Cultural Value Conflicts

2012· dissertation· en· W2624481963 on OpenAlexaffabout
Dina Buttu

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace (University of Toronto) · 2012
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEating Disorders and Behaviors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcculturationEthnic groupDistressPsychologySocial psychologyValue (mathematics)Identity (music)Psychological distressGender studiesSociologyPolitical scienceClinical psychologyMental healthAnthropologyPsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, relationships between disordered eating and body shape challenges in relation to three culturally related variables of acculturation, ethnic identity, and bicultural stress and conflict were examined in a sample of 196 Arab-Canadian women. A series of correlational analyses and hierarchical regressions were performed. Results showed that bicultural stress and conflict predicted a significant amount of variability in disordered eating and body shape concerns, including internalization of the thinness ideal, over and above both ethnic identity and acculturation. Furthermore, significant three way-interactions revealed that bicultural stress and conflict moderated the relationships among Arab-Orientation and Anglo-Orientation as predictors of disordered eating symptoms. Bicultural stress and conflict also moderated the relationships among ethnic identity and acculturation as predictors of eating disorder symptoms. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score0.384

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace (University of Toronto)→Same topicEating Disorders and Behaviors→French-language works237,207→