MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2624488113 · doi:10.1086/693231

: <i>Les cinq sens entre Moyen Âge et Renaissance: Enjeux épistémologiques et esthétiques</i>

2017· article· fr· W2624488113 on OpenAlexaff
Marlene L. Eberhart

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance Quarterly · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance and Early Modern Studies
Canadian institutionsVanier College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe RenaissanceArtHumanitiesPhilosophyArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les cinq sens entre Moyen Âge et Renaissance: Enjeux épistémologiques et esthétiques. Olga Anna Duhl and Jean-Marie Fritz, eds. Sociétés. Dijon: Éditions Universitaires de Dijon, 2016. 186 pp. €18. - Volume 70 Issue 2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.758
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance QuarterlySame topicRenaissance and Early Modern StudiesFrench-language works237,207