MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2624488113 · doi:10.1086/693231

: <i>Les cinq sens entre Moyen Âge et Renaissance: Enjeux épistémologiques et esthétiques</i>

2017· article· fr· W2624488113 on OpenAlexaff
Marlene L. Eberhart

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance Quarterly · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance and Early Modern Studies
Canadian institutionsVanier College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe RenaissanceArtHumanitiesPhilosophyArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les cinq sens entre Moyen Âge et Renaissance: Enjeux épistémologiques et esthétiques. Olga Anna Duhl and Jean-Marie Fritz, eds. Sociétés. Dijon: Éditions Universitaires de Dijon, 2016. 186 pp. €18. - Volume 70 Issue 2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.119

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.011
Scholarly communication0.0100.012
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance QuarterlySame topicRenaissance and Early Modern StudiesFrench-language works237,207