MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Outcome of acute Myeloid Leukemia in Adults Patients Treated According to Morocco National AML-MA-2011 Protocol in Casablanca, Morocco

2016· article· en· W2624497242 on OpenAlexaff
Romaric Massi, Mouna Lamchahab, Hanaa Bencharef, Bienvenu Houssou, Nisrine Khoubila, Siham Cherkoui, Meryem Qachouh, Mohamed Rachid, Abdallah Madani, Uma H. Athale, Asmaa Quessar

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityHamilton Health SciencesMcMaster Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBone marrowInternal medicineMyeloid leukemiaBiopsyGiemsa stainSurgeryPediatricsPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Treatment of AML in developing countries is a very great challenge. In Morocco, the major causes of therapy failure are delay in diagnosis, early (prior to start of therapy) and induction deaths, induction failures and abandonment of therapy. In 2011, the national AML-MA-2011 protocol was initiated to treat AML patients according to international standards and was focused on the improvement of supportive care with particular the prevention and management of infection, transfusion support, the patient, family and nurses education on hygien. The objective of this new protocol was to obtained more than 70% of complete remission, deaths in inductions less than 10%, and EFS at 4years at 40%. The aim of this study is to evaluate the results in adults AML patients treated with AML MA 2011 protocol in Casablanca Hematology Departement. Patients and Methods : Were reviewed the data ofpatients (aged 18-60yrs) treated according to AML-MA-2011 protocol from 1st january 2011 to 31th december 2015. Patients with APL or secondary AML were excluded. AML was diagnosed by studying peripheral blood smears, bone marrow aspiration, and biopsy slides stained with May-Grünwald Giemsa and myeloperoxidase. Immunophenotypic and cytogenetic studies were performed at diagnosis on bone marrow samples. AML was defined as the presence of more than 20% of myeloblasts in the bone marrow. Subtype of AML was recorded according to French-American-British (FAB) classification. Karyotype was performed on marrow sample, R banding technique was used. WHO 2008 prognostic classification was adopted. Patients with hyperleukocytosis (WBC≥ 50G/L) received as a pre-phase 4 days of hydroxyurea to 50mg/kg/day. The two courses of induction associated Cytarabine (100mg/m² q 12h (day 1-10)), Daunorubicin (50 mg/m² (day 2, 4, 6) for the first course, on days 1, 3, 5 for the second course) and etoposide (100mg/m² only at second course of induction). The consolidation included Cytarabine (3g/m² q 12h (day1-3) for first and second course and 1 g/m² (day1-3) on third course) plus Daunorubicin (30mg/m² (day 3-4 and day 1-3) at the first and third consolidation. L-Asparaginase 6000UI/m² on day 4 was give at second consolidation. Patients received CNS prophylaxis. Platelet support was provided in the case of bleeding, or whenever the platelet count was less than 10 × 109/L. For infections, Ceftazidime was the first line of antibiotic used. Amikacin was added for persistent fever beyomd 48-h or clinical deterioration. Imipenem was used for persistent fever. Additional antibiotic or antifungal or antiviral was dictated by clinical and biological findings. Complete remission (CR) was defined as the absence of abnormal clinical symptoms and having less than 5% of myeloblasts in the bone marrow, absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; absolute neutrophil count >1.0 × 109/L; platelet count >75 × 109/L; independence of red cell transfusions. The analysis of data was done by SPSS 18.0 Résultats : 559 adults patients were diagnosed for AML,323 was treated by AML-MA-2011 protocol from 2011-2015. The median age was 38 years (18-60), the sex ratio M/F was 1.10 ; the median hemoglobin (g/dl) was 7.15 (2.6-16.3) ; the median platelet (G/L) was 38.5 (1-620) ; the median leukocyte (G/L) was 17.97 (0.85-377). For cytology, according to FAB the dominants types was M1 : 98 (30.34%), M2 : 97 (30.03%), M4 : 51(15.78%). 249 (77.08%) patients had immunophenotyping. According to karyotype, 46 (14.24%) had good prognosis ; 216 (66.87%) was in intermediate group, 61 (18.88%) had adverse prognosis. Complete remission after two inductions was obtained with 197(60.99%) patients, inductions failure was noticed on 49(15.17%) patients, 98(30.34%) patients died during inductions cycles ; 152(47.05%) achieved the second consolidation cycles, 66 (33.50%) patients whose were in complete remission relapse. The OS at 3-years was estimated at 48.4%. The analysis of therapeutics results is summarized in the table. Conclusion : The therapeutics results of AML-MA-2011 protocol in the treatement of adults AML patients are satisfactory but could be improved with reduction of infection toxic deaths and improvement of supportive care therapy. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→French-language works237,207→