MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2624611628 · doi:10.60082/2817-5069.1047

Revisiting Cartographic Anxiety

2012· article· en· W2624611628 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rahul Rao

Bibliographic record

VenueOsgoode Hall law journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeographic Information Systems Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnxietyPsychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IN 1994, SANKARAN KRISHNA coined the term "cartographic anxiety" to describe a persistent neurosis that seemed to mark Indian practices of state and nation building.'To anyone who had occasion to open an atlas in India in the first half-century of its postcolonial existence, this neurosis would have been evident in the rubber stamp that Customs Department officials doggedly impressed upon the pages of any foreign publication that dared to represent the effective boundaries between India and its neighbours, Pakistan and China, rather than those the Indian state claimed for itself.The stamp read, "The external boundaries of India as depicted are neither accurate nor authentic."For Krishna, the term "cartography" encompasses all those representational practices that, in various ways, have attempted to inscribe something called 'India' and to endow that entity with content, history, meaning, and purpose, taking within its ambit not

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOsgoode Hall law journalSame topicGeographic Information Systems StudiesFrench-language works237,207