DESEMPENHO OCUPACIONAL DE IDOSOS PRATICANTES DE HIDROGINÁSTICA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: The practice of water aerobics has acknowledged positive effects on health, contributing to an active aging. However, considering the alterations brought about by the aging process, the elderly may present difficulties to perform daily activities, indicating problems in occupational performance. Objective: To identify the problem-activities in occupational performance of the elderly who practice water aerobics and correlate their performance and satisfaction with their occupational performance. Method: Cross-sectional, correlational and descriptive study conducted with 45 elderly enrolled in an outreach project of water aerobics classes. A questionnaire was applied for sociodemographic characterization and an occupational performance evaluation was performed through the Canadian Measure of Occupational Performance. Results: Leisure was the area in which the highest number of elderly people has occupational performance problems. This area also involves activities considered more important by the elderly, mainly the practice of other physical exercises. Among the main occupational performance problems, seven activities are related to leisure, eight to productivity and nine to self-care – mainly due to the difficulty in functional mobility. There was a significant correlation between performance and satisfaction of the elderly (r = 0.770 and p ≥ 0.001). Conclusion: Elderly practitioners of water aerobics have problems in occupational performance. Thus, the development of projects with proposals of other physical exercises is considered fundamental. Such activities are important for the elderly, as they contribute to an active aging and to the quality of life in old age, reflecting the positive performance of self-care activities and productivity
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".