MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2624692377 · doi:10.9771/ccrh.v10i26.18670

CONSTRUINDO O PODER LOCAL

2006· article· pt· W2624692377 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCaderno CRH · 2006
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Economic Solidarity
Canadian institutionsCentre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesDecentralizationPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O autor discute novos paradigmas acerca do desenvolvimento local sustentável, baseado na concepção de que a gestão pública é também responsabilidade dos atores locais e que a descentralização das políticas, enquanto forma de redistribuição do poder, constitui-se num mecanismo de inclusão social e participação comunitárias, geradora de uma nova cultura política até então marcada pelo clientelismo. Partindo da crítica às formas tradicionais do poder local, contrapõe um modelo de desenvolvimento local sustentável, que envolve a formação de um novo poder e institucionalidade e de uma nova cultura centrada na solidariedade como instrumento de libertação e de articulação de energias sociais e políticas fragmentadas, partindo da informação. Este contexto supõe a superação das práticas autoritárias, dos relacionamentos que determinam uma cidadania passiva, transformando o desenvolvimento local sustentável num instrumento de democratização e transformação, pelo qual a sociedade se organiza, se capacita, se informa, ou seja, se empodera e constrói seu próprio futuro. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Poder local, distribuição de poder, desenvolvimento sustentável, participação política, cultura política. Constructing the local power Carlos Júlio Jara The author discusses new paradigms related to the local sustainable development based on the concept that the public actors are also responsible for the public management, and that the decentralization of policies, as a form of power redistribution, creates a mechanism of social inclusion and community participation that originates a new political culture in favor of a determined group. Starting from the criticism of the traditional local power forms, it opposes itself to a model of local sustainable development that involves the formation of a new power, instituting a new culture centered on solidarity as a instrument for the liberation and articulation of fragmented social and political energies, having information as a starting point. This contexts supposes that the authoritarian practices and the relationships that determine a passive citizenship can be overcome, transforming the local sustainable development in a democratization and transformation instrument. Thus the society can become more organized, qualified, informed, or in other words, powerful and able to construct its own future. KEY WORDS: Local Power, power distribution, sustainable development, political participation, political culture. Publicação Online do Caderno CRH: http://www.cadernocrh.ufba.br

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it