MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2624752970 · doi:10.4000/ema.3654

Introduction - Les migrations internationales dans l’Égypte postrévolutionnaire

2017· article· fr· W2624752970 on OpenAlexaff
Pauline Brücker

Bibliographic record

VenueÉgypte/Monde arabe · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Six ans après l’irruption des « révolutions » arabes, des mouvements contestataires et des autres soulèvements populaires sur les scènes médiatiques et dans les débats académiques, le conflit syrien a replacé la question migratoire au cœur de l’espace méditerranéen, et questionne le rôle de l’Égypte dans cette nouvelle équation. Les départs pour l’Europe depuis la côte égyptienne, quasiment inédits avant les mouvements contestataires de 2011, sont désormais de plus en plus nombreux. Les arrivées continues depuis la Corne de l’Afrique ou la Syrie activent ces routes migratoires naissantes, empruntées par ceux et celles qui s’efforcent de contrer et de déjouer les fermetures ou la dangerosité croissante des routes anciennes, tel l’axe passant par la Libye. Les dynamiques migratoires et les stratégies de tous les acteurs en jeu – États, migrants, exilés, organisations internationales, ONG, sociétés civiles – s’adaptent ainsi à des contextes changeants et tentent de se répondre, voire de s’influencer, dans des interactions et des négociations qui restent à interroger...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.107

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉgypte/Monde arabeSame topicPolitical and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207