Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter introduces the ensemble of the archaeological harbour site of Parc Saint-Georges, Lyon (Rhône region) that lies at the level of the ancient right bank of the Saône River. Commencing with the location and circumstances of this extensive salvage excavation (2004-2006), the principal characteristics of this land dig within a caisson of moulded concrete walls are then presented. After a description of the technical conditions of the dig and the complexity of the means employed, the principal results are mentioned begin-ning with the topographie évolution of this arm of the Saône River and its associated harbour vestiges. Then, the evolution of the port itself, in relation to the shipwrecks and the developments of the river bank, is described following a chronological progression. The modestly equipped Gallo-Roman river port of Lugdunum was followed by the development of a riverside quarter during the Middle Ages and by the creation of the port du Sablet in the 14th century, and then its enlargement throughout the following centuries (16th & 17th centuries). The evolution of the harbour structure in the 18th century was expressed in important architectural developments of the river bank (access stairs to the water, quays) that were striking within the urban fabric of Lyon and in terms of the economie significance of the port. Finally, the restructuring of the quays and the port district of Saint-Georges during the 19th and 20th centuries isolated the former port zone, whether ancient, medieval or modem, from the Saône River. The last stage of this reshaping of the river bank involved the digging of the underground parking area that would lead to the salvage excavation of the site and to the discovery of the 16 ships. The museographie future of those chosen as architectural exemplars is discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.096 | 0.058 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".