TINJAUAN DIMENSI EKONOMI KEBERLANJUTAN PENGELOLAAN BUDIDAYA LAUT DI TELUK SALEH KABUPATEN SUMBAWA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan status keberlanjutan pada dimensi ekonomi dan memberikan rekomendasi kebijakan pengelolaan budidaya di Teluk Saleh Kabupaten Sumbawa. Analisis keberlanjutan budidaya laut untuk komoditi rumput laut dan ikan kerapu sistem KJA dilakukan dengan metode Rap-Insus-Seaweed (Rapid Appraisal –Indeks Sustainability of Seaweed) dan Rap-Insus-Grouper (Rapid Appraisal –Indeks Sustainability of Grouper) telah dimodifikasi dari program RAPFISH. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa nilai indeks tingkat keberlanjutan pada dimensi ekonomi budidaya rumput laut sebesar “39,74” dan untuk budidaya ikan kerapu sistem KJA sebesar “31,23”. Nilai tersebut terletak antara 25,00 - 49,9 berarti “Kurang Berkelanjutan”. Nilai indeks dan status keberlanjutan saat ini menunjukkan kondisi ekonomi wilayah perairan tersebut kurang mendukung pengelolaan budidaya laut, sehingga diperlukan intervensi kebijakan melalui pemberian bantuan mudal usaha, pelatihan teknis budidaya dan pengolahan, dan peningkatan kapasitas kelembagaan pemasaran untuk meningkatkan status keberlanjutan pengelolaan dimensi ekonomi.Title: Sustainability Analysis of Mariculture Management in Saleh Bay of Sumbawa DistrictThis study aimed at determiny value of the index and the sustainability status in terms of economic dimension and provide recommendations for policies on marine aquaculture management in the Saleh Bay. Rap-Insus-Seaweed (Rapid Appraisal of Sustainability-Index Seaweed) and Rap-Insus-Grouper (Rapid Appraisal of Sustainability-Index Grouper) modified from Rapfish program were use in this study. Results showed that the index level of sustainability in terms of economic dimension were “39.74” and “31.23” for seaweed grouper espectively. This value laid between 25.00 and 49.9 indicating that both management status were “Less Sustainable”. These values indicate that the economic conditions of that particular site was not support sustainable management of the marine aquaculture. Hence, government policing intervention through increased capital, technical training in aquaculture and processing as well as improvement in market institution are required.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".