Bis(<i>N</i>′-{(<i>E</i>)-[(2<i>E</i>)-1,3-diphenylprop-2-en-1-ylidene]amino}-<i>N</i>-ethylcarbamimidothioato-κ<sup>2</sup><i>N</i>′,<i>S</i>)zinc(II): crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The title ZnIIcomplex, [Zn(C18H18N3S)2], (I), features two independent but chemically equivalent molecules in the asymmetric unit. In each, the thiosemicarbazonate monoanion coordinates the ZnIIatomviathe thiolate-S and imine-N atoms, with the resulting N2S2donor set defining a distorted tetrahedral geometry. The five-membered ZnSCN2chelate rings adopt distinct conformations in each independent molecule,i.e.one ring is almost planar while the other is twisted about the Zn—S bond. In the crystal, the two molecules comprising the asymmetric unit are linked by amine-N—H...N(imine) and amine-N—H...S(thiolate) hydrogen bondsviaan eight-membered heterosynthon, {...HNCN...HNCS}. The dimeric aggregates are further consolidated by benzene-C—H...S(thiolate) interactions and are linked into a zigzag supramolecular chain along thecaxisviaamine-N—H...S(thiolate) hydrogen bonds. The chains are connected into a three-dimensional architectureviaphenyl-C—H...π(phenyl) and π–π interactions, the latter occurring between chelate and phenyl rings [inter-centroid separation = 3.6873 (11) Å]. The analysis of the Hirshfeld surfaces calculated for (I) emphasizes the different interactions formed by the independent molecules in the crystal and the impact of the π–π interactions between chelate and phenyl rings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".