MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2624891243 · doi:10.1139/cjce-2016-0615

Diagnosis of partial blockage in water pipeline using support vector machine with fault-characteristic peaks in frequency domain

2017· article· en· W2624891243 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dae Shik Kim, Go Bong Choi, Kwang Ho Jang, Jung Chul Suh, Jong Min Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupport vector machineFrequency domainFault (geology)Classifier (UML)Pipeline (software)Time domainComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)EngineeringData miningArtificial intelligenceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Partial blockages in water pipe network can cause waste of energy and poor hygiene. Therefore, periodic diagnosis of water pipe state is necessary to maintain or replace blocked pipe when the blockage size is larger than a threshold. This work proposes a nondestructive diagnosis scheme that estimates the partial blockage in water pipe by classifying pressure signals in the frequency domain. Pressure data were collected with normal and two different fault states. A peak search algorithm is proposed to identify the ‘fault-characteristic’ peaks (FC-peaks) relevant for each blockage size. Support vector machine (SVM) classifier for each blockage was constructed with the FC-peaks as input. The SVM scores of different blockage sizes are used for diagnosis of partial blockage. The partial blockage can be diagnosed by comparing the SVM scores of different blockage sizes. The SVM classifier was able to successfully classify and diagnose three model pipes with normal state, moderate, and severe blockages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.327
Threshold uncertainty score0.715

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicWater Systems and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207