MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2625011533 · doi:10.1061/9780784480847.036

Simulation-Based Optimization of Building Renovation Considering Energy Consumption and Life-Cycle Assessment

2017· article· en· W2625011533 on OpenAlexaff
Seyed Amirhosain Sharif, Amin Hammad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHVACEnergy consumptionBuilding envelopePayback periodLife-cycle assessmentEnergy (signal processing)Efficient energy useConsumption (sociology)Building energy simulationComputer scienceArchitectural engineeringReliability engineeringEngineeringAir conditioningEnergy performanceProduction (economics)Mechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Buildings consume a tremendous amount of the total use of secondary energy resulting in a considerable impact on the environment. Therefore, it is necessary to reduce their energy consumption by improving the design of new buildings or renovating existing buildings. However, renovating building envelopes and energy systems to lessen energy losses is usually expensive and has a long payback period. Despite the significant contribution of the research about optimizing energy consumption, there is limited research focusing on the renovation of existing buildings to minimize their environmental impact using life cycle assessment (LCA). This study aims to develop a methodology to optimize the energy performance of existing buildings by selecting the optimal renovation strategies considering LCA. Different scenarios can be combined in a building renovation strategy to improve energy efficiency. Each scenario considers several factors including improvement of the building envelopes, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems, and local energy generation systems. However, some of these scenarios could be inconsistent and should be eliminated. Another consideration in this research is the appropriate coupling of renovation scenarios. For example, the HVAC system must be redesigned when renovating the building envelope to consider the reduced energy demand and to avoid undesirable side effects. A genetic algorithm (GA) coupled with an energy simulation tool is used for simultaneously minimizing the energy consumption and the LCA of the building. The simulation tool is used to calculate the energy consumption for each potential solution representing one renovation scenario. The data of the building characteristics are extracted from the building information model (BIM). The feasibility of the proposed method is demonstrated using a case study focusing on the buildings of Concordia University.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationFrench-language works237,207