MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2625022492 · doi:10.21433/b3110mb7825q

Spatial Data Considerations for a Trauma Transport Spatial Decision Support System

2016· article· en· W2625022492 on OpenAlexaff
Yekaterina Vasilyeva, Michael J. Widener, Zachary Ginsberg, Samuel M. Galvagno

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on GIScience Short Paper Proceedings · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic and Road Safety
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Spatial contextual awarenessSpatial analysisOperations researchGeographic information systemComputer scienceData scienceGeographyMedical emergencyEngineeringCartographyMedicineArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the recent proliferation of sensing and tracking technologies in medical settings, hospitals have the ability to integrate real-time spatial and aspatial data to make important logistical decisions. One area in need of this is trauma transportation, where patient outcomes are sensitive to the mode of transportation and the time it takes to receive care. This research presents a spatial decision support system that uses real-time information to guide medical personnel responsible for making complicated transportation choices with a diverse set of dynamic and static spatial and aspatial variables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.785
Threshold uncertainty score0.705

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Conference on GIScience Short Paper ProceedingsSame topicTraffic and Road SafetyFrench-language works237,207