MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2625139559 · doi:10.1121/1.4987588

Quantifying connectivity to auditory cortex: Implications for crossmodal plasticity and hearing restoration

2017· article· en· W2625139559 on OpenAlexaff
Blake E. Butler, Stephen G. Lomber

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrossmodalNeuroscienceAuditory cortexSomatosensory systemSensory systemStimulus modalityNeuroplasticityPsychologyVisual perceptionPerception

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When one sensory modality is lost, compensatory advantages are observed in the remaining senses. There is evidence to suggest these advantages reflect recruitment of cortical areas that normally process sound. In the cat, crossmodal reorganization of auditory cortex appears to be field specific. While little or no activity is evoked in primary cortical regions by visual and somatosensory stimulation, higher-level fields confer increased peripheral acuity and improved visual motion detection. In order to better understand the changes in neural connections that underscore these functional adaptations, we have undertaken a series of detailed anatomical studies aimed at quantifying and comparing the patterns of connectivity in hearing and deaf animals. A retrograde neuronal tracer was deposited into auditory cortical areas, coronal sections were taken, and neurons showing positive retrograde labeling were counted and assigned to cortical and thalamic areas. Projections within and between sensory modalities were quantified; while some small-scale differences emerge, patterns of connectivity are overwhelmingly preserved across experimental groups within each cortical field examined. This structural preservation has implications for our understanding of the mechanisms that underlie crossmodal reorganization; moreover, it suggests that the connectivity necessary for resumption of auditory function may withstand even lengthy periods of deprivation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America→Same topicNeural dynamics and brain function→French-language works237,207→