MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2625163356

Vécu maternel de l’accompagnement de la sage-femme en salle de naissance chez des femmes primipares

2016· article· en· W2625163356 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anaîs Adet

Bibliographic record

VenueINRIA a CCSD electronic archive server · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Medicine and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: childbirth’s maternal experience can have a major impact, on women and families life in a short and a long term. Many factors influence it. The “Empowerment” is recognized as promoting positive women’s experience in the anglo-saxon and quebec literature. It proposes that caregivers, especially midwives, have the role to let women to experience it. The main objective is to optimize the support for women from midwives in delivery room. The operational objective is to perceive what women retain in the immediate postpartum about the offered support by midwives in delivery room. Three hypothesis are issued: women evoke the importance to express themselves about their needs regarding their delivery and to be actively listened by the midwife. According to women experience, it is recognized that information about the labor given by the midwife is essential to be involved in the delivery room during the childbirth. The midwife support is mainly dedicated to patient’s labor pain management. Material and Methods: this is a qualitative study with fifteen semi-structured interviews occurring in type three maternity ward postpartum service Louis Mourier (Colombes, 92). Interviews have taken place between the first day and the day before the patient release from the maternity ward. Obstetric and demographic data were also collected from patient records. Inclusion criteria were: primiparity and primigravidity. Non-inclusion criteria were: therapeutic abortion, fetal death in utero, perinatal death, patients wishing to make an abandonment procedure and minor patients. Exclusion criteria were: patients who did not speak french and who refused to participate at the study. Results: the first hypothesis is confirmed: the expression of women needs and the support given by the midwife are necessary. But a third of women said that they didn’t feel any needs. The second hypothesis is partially confirmed: women evoke the important role of receiving information but they did not directly link this information to their active involvement. It helps women to realize, to project themselves and to understand the childbirth process. They are also vectors of kindness, reinsurance and consideration of their own person.The third hypothesis is not confirmed: aid pain relief is not the main role of the midwife. It is even mentioned there absence in this role. Nevertheless, the midwife provides physical and emotional support to patients. She advises them for the use of epidural analgesia.Conclusion: the operational objective is reached, additional studies could be necessary to use these results in the practice of midwifery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverSame topicHealth, Medicine and SocietyFrench-language works237,207