MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2625296316

Proper Names in Slovene: Implications for defaults in inflectional morphology

2006· article· en· W2625296316 on OpenAlexafffund
Joseph Paul Stemberger

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLinguisticsAffixPluralNounMorphemeProper nounMeaning (existential)HistoryComputer sciencePsychologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inflectional systems generally contain default patterns, such as pl.-s in English, which are used in the absence of a reason to use a nondefault pattern.Contentious points include whether there can be more than one default pattern, whether proper names must follow the default pattern, and whether default patterns cover all words in the language.In Slovene, nouns are inflected for 6 cases and 3 numbers, and may be of 3 genders.Masculine gender appears to be the general default, showing the most widespread generalization, while feminine inflections generalize only to nouns that end in -a, including proper names.Female proper names that do not end in -a receive no overt inflections, with differences between surnames and personal names.Proper names do not have to follow default patterns, and may be ineligible for any inflectional rule at all.While standard linguistic and connectionist approaches can deal with the facts, the Marcus-Clahsen-Pinker approach finds the data challenging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score0.783

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)Same topicSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic VariationFrench-language works237,207