Is There Any Relationship Between Agricultural Performance and Inclusive Growth Iin Nigeria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In examining the initial role of the Agricultural sector in Nigeria, the sector is seen to be an indispensable sector in establishing the framework for the nationâÂÂs economic growth. Hence, increased agricultural production is expected to be a core pre-requisite for rapid economic growth in a developing nation like Nigeria. Efforts by the successive governments to sustain the countryâÂÂs agricultural sector are evident in various yearly allocations to this sector with respect to lending and budgetary provisions. However, the issue of concern is, why has the increase in government financing of the agricultural sector not translated into the expected increase in agricultural inclusive growth. It is therefore, worthy of note that the neglect of this sector overtime has brought about an increase in rural poverty, migration, hunger and crimes, in the last few years of our economic growth. Hence, this study assesses the impact of agricultural performance on inclusive growth in Nigeria. Using Johansen Co-integration test and fully-Modified Ordinary Least Square. The study found a long run relationship among the variables of interest, while agricultural financing exact more long run effect on per capita income (economic inclusive growth indicator). This paper concludes that, government should invest more in activities that promotes agricultural gains and leads to pro-poor growth, in addition to broadly aligning agricultural spending, in order to stimulate qualitative growth in the sector by giving regular financial support to farmers. Such support however, must be monitored and periodically reviewed in order to access its effectiveness and prevent misallocation of funds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".