MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2625340222 · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.7671

Mathematical and Computational Sciences Division :

2010· report· en· W2625340222 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ronald F. Boisvert

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJacobs UniversityUniversidad de ValladolidUniversidad de CantabriaUniversità degli Studi di PalermoUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignSichuan UniversityUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulDalhousie UniversitySeoul National UniversityTechnische Universiteit DelftUniversiteit van AmsterdamRijksuniversiteit GroningenUniversity of BristolUniversity of LeedsUniversity of St AndrewsUniversity of MissouriYork UniversityNew Mexico State UniversityNorth Carolina State UniversityIowa State UniversityGeorge Washington UniversityLouisiana State UniversityDrexel UniversityTechnische Universität BerlinUniversity of WaikatoGeorgetown UniversityVrije Universiteit AmsterdamPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity of WashingtonJohns Hopkins UniversityUniversity of Texas at ArlingtonState University of New YorkOhio State UniversityJustus Liebig Universität GießenTulane UniversityUniversity of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeUniversity of PennsylvaniaMacalester CollegeUtah State UniversityGeorge Mason University
KeywordsDivision (mathematics)Mathematical sciencesComputer scienceMathematicsMathematics educationArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

technical work of the Mathematical and Computational Sciences Division (MCSD) of NIST's Information Technology Laboratory. Part I (Overview) provides a high-level overview of the Division's activities, including highlights of technical accomplishments during the previous year. Part II (Features) provides further details on ten projects of particular note this year. This is followed in Part III (Project Summaries) by brief synopses of all technical projects active during the past year. Part IV (Activity Data) provides listings of publications, technical talks, and other professional activities in which Division staff members have participated. The reporting period covered by this

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.838
Threshold uncertainty score0.554

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207