L’histoire des études en communication au Québec et le dogme de la rupture, ou l’héritage peu célébré des intellectuels canadiens-français des années 1940 et 1950
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose une excursion dans le passe des sciences humaines canadiennes-francaises, lesquelles remontent aux annees 1930. Dans le champ quebecois des etudes en communication, le role des intellectuel.le.s a rarement ete etudie, surtout en ce qui concerne son histoire. L’article commence par un bref resume de l’apparition institutionnelle de la discipline au Quebec au debut des annees 1970, puis decrit l’evolution des sciences sociales au Canada francais, de 1938 a 1960. Il traite ensuite de la confrontation de recits historiographiques qui expliquent l’evolution la societe quebecoise au 20 e siecle, pour terminer avec l’apport du pionnier de la sociologie quebecoise, Jean-Charles Falardeau
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.022 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".