MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2625365064

L’histoire des études en communication au Québec et le dogme de la rupture, ou l’héritage peu célébré des intellectuels canadiens-français des années 1940 et 1950

2017· article· fr· W2625365064 on OpenAlex
François Yelle

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Eletrônica Internacional de Economia Política da Informação da Comunicação e da Cultura c · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article propose une excursion dans le passe des sciences humaines canadiennes-francaises, lesquelles remontent aux annees 1930. Dans le champ quebecois des etudes en communication, le role des intellectuel.le.s a rarement ete etudie, surtout en ce qui concerne son histoire. L’article commence par un bref resume de l’apparition institutionnelle de la discipline au Quebec au debut des annees 1970, puis decrit l’evolution des sciences sociales au Canada francais, de 1938 a 1960. Il traite ensuite de la confrontation de recits historiographiques qui expliquent l’evolution la societe quebecoise au 20 e siecle, pour terminer avec l’apport du pionnier de la sociologie quebecoise, Jean-Charles Falardeau

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.009
Scholarly communication0.0160.014
Open science0.0080.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it