MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2625406197 · doi:10.4300/jgme-d-17-00015.1

Podcasting in Medical Education: How Long Should an Educational Podcast Be?

2017· letter· en· W2625406197 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Graduate Medical Education · 2017
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Media in Health Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActive listeningGraduate medical educationMedical educationMedicinePsychologyAccreditation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We were pleased to read guidance for the development of podcasts for graduate medical education (GME) in the July 2016 issue of the Journal of Graduate Medical Education. Ahn and colleagues1 recommended a 10- to 20-minute format for a podcast, and we would like to expand on that recommendation and share additional input on style and format concerns.How long will trainees listen to an educational podcast? What is the ideal length for learning? Primary evidence may be lacking, but there appears to be a consensus that learner attention in lecture settings wanes after 10 minutes.2 We recently shared our own 20-minute pilot podcast for telephone triage education with pediatrics residents to better evaluate format and length issues. We have done this subjectively using a survey and objectively using the YouTube (Google, San Bruno, CA) platform to record listening times.While most of the 27 responding residents described the length as “about right,” 22% (6 of 27) reported that it could be slightly shorter. Only 1 resident requested longer content. This fits well with a 2013 survey of Canadian anesthesiology residents reporting that most would prefer a 5- to 15-minute or a 15- to 30-minute format for educational podcasts, with 5 to 15 minutes being preferred for most topics.3 A preference for 5- to 15-minute running time was also expressed in another survey by learners outside of GME,4 and a study of medical students reported that 15 to 20 minutes was the “optimal” length.5 Our objective data showed that, of those who listen beyond 1 minute, 28% dropped off near the 10-minute mark (figure).Content may ultimately dictate length, but a good starting aim may be a total length of 10 to 15 minutes.Many other style and content issues receive a passing mention in the literature. Our survey finds support for dialog being preferred over monolog format (93%, 25 of 27); citation of current evidence (67%, 18 of 27); use of personal anecdotes (52%, 14 of 27); and humor (37%, 10 of 27). Multiple trainees requested summary points, either between sections or at the end. One trainee requested a platform where 1.25× or 1.5× speed was available, consistent with our own listening habits.As avid listeners and producers of content, we look forward to seeing further scholarship on best practices in podcasting in GME.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.158
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.273
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.158
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.265
GPT teacher head0.491
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it