MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2625710109 · doi:10.18357/jcs.v37i2.15203

“It`ll All Come Out In the Wash”: Managing Policy Change in an Informal Parent-Child Program

2012· article· en· W2625710109 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Roz Stooke

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Childhood Studies · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicResearch in Social Sciences
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeWork (physics)SociologyPublic relationsPedagogyCritical reflectionQualitative researchPsychologyPolitical scienceSocial scienceEngineeringArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper draws on a qualitative case study to discuss ways in which a group of practitioners employed in an informal, community-based, parent-child program were experiencing recent changes in Ontario’s early years policies. I conceptualize the practitioners’ efforts to manage the changes as transition work, by which I mean that they were working to develop ways of participating in a fast-changing professional world. The paper explores ways in which a narrative approach to documenting program activities can bring visibility to practitioners’ work and support critical reflection on practice. I employ two stories to provoke further discussion about larger stories of change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.450
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.198
GPT teacher head0.507
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Childhood StudiesSame topicResearch in Social SciencesFrench-language works237,207