MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2625748663 · doi:10.1109/mmul.2017.265091158

Visual Nonverbal Behavior Analysis: The Path Forward

2017· article· en· W2625748663 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Multimedia · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEmotion and Mood Recognition
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceNonverbal communicationHuman–computer interactionContext (archaeology)CoachingArtificial intelligencePsychologyCommunication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Social signal processing (SSP) is a promising automated technology that aims to provide computers with the ability to sense and understand human social behaviors. Representative SSP applications include novel human-computer interaction mechanisms that enhance machine sensitivity of users emotional and mental states, more engaging games, ambient intelligence systems responsive to social context, and new quantitative psychological evaluation tools for coaching or diagnosis. Based on adopted cues, existing SSP methods can be categorized as verbal or nonverbal. Over the last decade, significant progress has been accomplished in visual nonverbal behavior analysis (VNBA). However, several emerging issues such as fusion of multimodal cues, context estimation, and user privacy protection still need to be addressed adequately. The authors present an overview of VNBA and describe various research challenges and proposed solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it