MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2625816477 · doi:10.1111/sapm.12177

Asymptotics of Pseudo‐Jacobi Polynomials with Varying Parameters

2017· article· en· W2625816477 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Applied Mathematics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical functions and polynomials
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthogonalityJacobi polynomialsMathematicsOrthogonal polynomialsComplex planeMehler–Heine formulaClassical orthogonal polynomialsDiscrete orthogonal polynomialsPlane (geometry)Gegenbauer polynomialsReal lineDifference polynomialsMatrix (chemical analysis)Wilson polynomialsDifferential equationMathematical analysisGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we study the asymptotic behavior of the Pseudo‐Jacobi polynomials as for z in the whole complex plane. These polynomials are also known as the Romanovski–Routh polynomials. They occur in quantum mechanics, quark physics, and random matrix theory. When the parameter a is fixed or , there is no real‐line orthogonality. Here, we consider the case when the parameters a and b depend on n ; more precisely, we assume and , where are real constants. Our main tool is the asymptotic method developed for differential equations with a large parameter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.421
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.146
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it