Utilization of Displaced Land of Former Red Stone Excavation for Milkfish Farming by Stick Net Cage System (A Case Study at Gentungan, Gowa Regency, South Sulawesi, Indonesia)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was conducted at Gentungan village, West Bajeng District, Gowa Regency, South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia for four months, i.e., from March to July 2016. The study aimed to (1) determine the feasibility of water quality for nursing at the former land of red stone excavation, (2) analyze the growth rate, and (3) analyze the survival rate. Method used in this study was the stick net cage system which sized 4.0 × 3.0 × 1.5 m, with an average density was 20 fish/m3. The results showed that (1) the measurement and analysis results of water quality during the nursering period were still in the limits of feasibility as presented in Table 1, (2) the analysis results of growth rate were obtained an average growth rate of 117 gram for 160 days, and (3) the survival rate was 86%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".