MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2626003226

A multi-cohort project-based learning course realized through partnerships with local community actors

2017· article· en· W2626003226 on OpenAlexaffabout
Aude Motulsky, Pierre‐Marie David, Caroline Robitaille, Daniel Cortés Vargas, Marie-France Beauchesne, Johanne Collin

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacy Education · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInterprofessional Education and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumPharmacyMedical educationPromotion (chess)Course (navigation)Health careHealth promotionHealth professionalsMedicineEngineering managementPublic healthPsychologyPedagogyEngineeringNursingPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Teaching public health principles such as health promotion to healthcare professionals has gained attention in the last decade. The objective of this paper is to describe an innovative course that was developed in the Pharm.D programme in the Faculty of Pharmacy at the Universite de Montreal with a focus on health promotion through community-based project learning. First, it describes the course which was structured in twelve learning units given in two semesters to first and second year students who were grouped in teams of eight to ten. Then, it describes the instructional and evaluation methods for the course, including the development of an application to perform two 360-degree assessments within each team. Finally, it gives an overview of the projects realised since the implementation of the course, as well as future development within the Pharm.D curriculum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.249
GPT teacher head0.570
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmacy EducationSame topicInterprofessional Education and CollaborationFrench-language works237,207