Bibliographic record
Abstract
Esse trabalho analisa o mito de Don Juan em duas obras das Américas (Le Don Juan chrétien - 1966, do autor quebequense Jacques Ferron, e Don Juan acorrentado -1999, da autora brasileira Wanda Fabian) a partir da análise de Jean Rousset (O mito de Don Juan - 1981), que estuda o mito através de três pontos fundamentais: o ser inconstante, o grupo feminino e a figura do morto. Inicialmente apresenta-se o percurso histórico do mito de Don Juan na literatura escrita da Europa, observando as suas características. Em um segundo momento, desenvolve-se a análise de Jean Rousset e em seguida, estuda-se a migração do mito para o imaginário americano, no Quebec, com a obra de Jacques Ferron e no Brasil, com a obra de Wanda Fabian, tratando-o através dos três pontos fundamentais levantados por Jean Rousset. Por fim, busca-se observar as transformações do mito de Don Juan ao encontrar-se em um novo contexto social e literário, ao migrar para um novo imaginário cultural. Busca-se ainda estudar quais características do mito inicial serão mantidas nessas recorrências americanas e quais o ressemantizarão.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".