Fiber type composition of the palmaris brevis muscle: implications for palmar function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The palmaris brevis (PB) is a small muscle of variant morphology located on the ulnar aspect of the palm, superficial to the hypothenar eminence. Functionally, the PB has been proposed to protect the neurovasculature of the ulnar canal from compressive forces during repetitive or intermittent trauma associated with grasping. Although PB function has been inferred from cadaveric observations, it is unknown whether it has the contractile capacity and fatigue-resistance necessary to withstand these functional demands. Insight into the functional specialization of the PB can be provided through investigating the proportions of type I and type II muscle fibers by staining for myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoforms using immunohistochemical methods. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to quantify the proportion of type I and type II muscle fibers to provide insight into the role of the PB in palmar function based on its gross histological structure. Sixteen PB specimens were harvested from the hands (eight right, eight left) of eight formalin-embalmed cadavers (mean age: 75 ± 14 years; three males, five females). PB muscle composition was determined by labeling serial cross-sections with MHC type I and type II monoclonal antibodies. The results indicate that the PB is primarily composed of type I muscle fibers (72.2 ± 13.7%), with no significant differences between left and right hands. Given the predominance of type I muscle fibers, our findings indicate the PB may be fatigue-resistant and thus, capable of contracting for prolonged durations. This supports cadaveric observations indicating that the PB functions to protect the ulnar neurovasculature of the palm by providing a muscular barrier in addition to serving as a functional anchor to the hypothenar fat pad when objects are firmly compressed into the palm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".