MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2626151977 · doi:10.1299/jsmeenv.2016.26.203

MBT (Mechanical Biological Treatment) can be used to help promote heat recovery from RDF.

2016· article· en· W2626151977 on OpenAlexaff
Yoichi Watanabe

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Proceedings of the Symposium on Environmental Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetallurgy and Material Science
Canadian institutionsHealth Research Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRDFRefuse-derived fuelWaste managementGreenhouse gasProcess (computing)Mechanical biological treatmentEnvironmental scienceRaw materialMunicipal solid wasteProcess engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringChemistryWaste collection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The solid fuel know as RDF (Refuse Derived Fuel) can be used to recover energy from waste while also helping to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Although there is an increasing interest in RDF, several issues hinder greater uptake of this technology. We investigated strategies to address these issues, based on surveys and examples of best practice. We found that the process of separating raw kitchen waste from burnable waste addresses many of the issues with RDF. In particular, we believe that MBT (Mechanical Biological Treatment), which combines methane fermentation with RDF production, can be used to help promote heat recovery from RDF. Further investigation is required into MBT technology, including ① testing of waste separation processes and ② trials of energy generated from separated waste to validate case studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Proceedings of the Symposium on Environmental EngineeringSame topicMetallurgy and Material ScienceFrench-language works237,207