MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2626172647 · doi:10.14796/jwmm.r235-08

Video Processing Techniques for Assisted CCTV Inspection and Condition Rating of Sewers

2009· article· en· W2626172647 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Nima Sarshar, Mahmoud R. Halfawy, Jantira Hengmeechai

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Water Management Modeling · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of Regina
FundersUniversity of Regina
KeywordsSanitary sewerComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceEngineeringWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter describes the development of a software system to semiautomatically extract historical condition data information from archived sewer inspection CCTV files. The software represents and manages the sewer data in a centralized repository. Users can easily access inspection and condition data via a GIS interface. The software implements video processing algorithms to support semi-automatic evaluation of the CCTV recording by automatically detecting defect features and assisting the user to define scores and rating according to a pre-defined condition rating scheme. The software was successfully used to efficiently access, analyze, and evaluate sewer condition data from CCTV video files obtained from the City of Regina.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2009
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Water Management ModelingSame topicInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringFrench-language works237,207