MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2626319421 · doi:10.7202/1039909ar

Lire Claude Simon lisant Proust

2017· article· fr· W2626319421 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTangence · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Literature and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Comme Roland Barthes, Claude Simon aurait pu écrire « Proust, c’est ce qui me vient », tant Marcel Proust est omniprésent dans l’ensemble de son oeuvre, se cache dans la plupart de ses recoins, les plus lumineux comme les plus sombres. Qu’il le prenne comme modèle de ses propres expérimentations dans ses entretiens, puise dans son oeuvre des leçons de composition, partage avec lui le goût des métaphores, déstructure et parodie ses analyses psychologiques, en fasse un personnage de ses romans, le regarde travailler et relire ses épreuves ou décrive avec lyrisme ses phrases « d’une mortelle somptuosité », il semble le lire et le relire sans fin. En suivant quelques fils de lecture, qui parfois s’entremêlent — la mémoire, les haies d’aubépines, les rats, la peinture ou les poissons cathédrales —, cet article tente de lire Simon lisant Proust, de lire Proust écrit par Simon, de lire Simon en prenant par Proust, de (re)lire Proust à travers Simon, etc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it