MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2626332465 · doi:10.1101/145383

A genome-wide polygenic approach to HIV acquisition uncovers link to inflammatory bowel disease and identifies potential novel genetic variants

2017· preprint· en· W2626332465 on OpenAlexaff
Robert A. Power, Christian W. Thorball, István Bartha, John R. B. Perry, Paul J. McLaren, Túlio de Oliveira, Jacques Fellay

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2017
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaPublic Health Agency of Canada
FundersMedical Research CouncilInyuvesi Yakwazulu-NataliBundesamt für GesundheitWellcome Trust
KeywordsBiologyGenome-wide association studyGeneticsPhenotypeComputational biologyGeneSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Polygenic approaches using genome-wide data have been hugely successful in confirming and quantifying the heritability of complex human traits. Here, we highlight their ability to identify potential novel risk variants by looking for variants with pleiotropic effect in genetically overlapping phenotypes. We used LD Score Regression in a sample of 6,315 HIV+ European individuals and 7,247 controls to test for phenotypes genetically overlapping with susceptibility to HIV-1 infection. Using LD Hub, a web tool that performs LD Score Regression, identified two phenotypes with significant genetic overlap: schizophrenia (rG =0.19, p=0.0007 and ulcerative colitis (rG=0.22, p= 0.0061). We further showed that the genetic overlap between HIV acquisition and schizophrenia is likely driven in part by their shared overlap with cannabis use and sexual behavior. BUMHBOX analyses suggested that these genetic overlaps were driven by genome-wide pleiotropy with HIV acquisition rather than heterogeneity within the HIV acquisition sample. The two diseases identified as genetically overlapping with HIV-1 acquisition have >100 associated variants, and we tested if any of them significantly associated with HIV acquisition. We observed three variants that exceeded our threshold for statistical significance. Two of these were eQTLs in whole blood for genes coding for proteins suspected to be involved in HIV biology: rs1819333 in CCR6 (p=0.0002) and rs4932178 in FURIN (p=0.00033). However, no signal was found for these variants in two smaller African samples totaling 1015 cases and 963 controls, though the mode of acquisition and genetic architecture of these populations differed. These results highlight the ability to use polygenic methods to gain new insights into complex diseases and identify potential associations with individual variants. Crucially, the leveraging of existing, publically available data makes these methods a cost-effective approach. In this case, our results add to the evidence for the role of risk taking behavior and inflammation of the bowel in HIV acquisition. Author Summary The biology of what puts certain individuals at greater risk of HIV acquisition is poorly understood. Using several novel polygenic methods, we identify supporting evidence for two important factors leading to acquisition. First, the role of an individual’s genetic predisposition to risk taking behaviours such as number of sexual partners, age at first sexual intercourse drug use, and mental health problems. Second, the role of gut inflammation, in particular a genetic overlap between HIV acquisition with inflammatory bowel disease and the potential role of CCR6 during infection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology→French-language works237,207→