MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2626486212 · doi:10.2527/asasann.2017.573

573 Over-feeding metabolizable protein supply in late gestation beef cattle: Effects on DMI, ruminal fermentation, and performance

2017· article· en· W2626486212 on OpenAlexaff
Koryn S Hare, Katharine M Wood, Carolyn Fitzsimmons, G.B. Penner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of GuelphUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPost partumAnimal scienceCrossbreedRandomized block designDry matterBeef cattleBiologyPregnancyAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective was to determine the effect of oversupplying metabolizable protein (MP) pre-partum on DMI, BW, and ruminal fermentation. Twenty-four primiparous crossbred Hereford cows were assigned to a high protein (HP; 140% of MP requirement, n = 12) or control (CON; 100% of predicted MP requirement, n = 12) treatment. Cows were individually fed their treatment diet from d -56 relative to parturition and then were switched to a common diet post-partum. Post-partum cows were individually housed until d 33 following parturition and group-housed by pre-partum treatment thereafter. Dry matter intake was measured throughout the study and summarized by week. Cow BW was measured on d -56, -42, -28, -8, 7, 14, 28, 57, 82, and 112 relative to parturition. Ruminal pH was measured from d -35 to 28, and digesta samples were taken on d -34, -16, 7, and 28 for short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) and ammonia measurements. Data were analyzed as a completely randomized block design using the MIXED procedure of SAS. Fixed included treatment, time, and the two-way interaction, while random effects were cow and block. Time (day or week) was analyzed as a repeated measure. Pre-partum BW of CON did not differ among days; whereas, HP cows increased BW as parturition approached (P= 0.01). Post-partum BW did not differ by treatment or day. Treatment did not affect DMI, but DMI decreased by 7.7% from wk -2 to -1 (P<0.01), and, post-partum, cows consumed 14.1 and 8.8% less in wk 3 relative to wk 1 and 4 (P<0.01). Mean ruminal pH was not affected by treatment, but tended to increase (P= 0.06) the week prior to parturition. After parturition, mean ruminal pH decreased from wk 1 to 2 (6.67 vs 6.40;P<0.01). Total ruminal SCFA concentration was not affected by treatment during the pre- or post-partum periods, averaging 112 and 120 mM, respectively. However, pre-partum concentrations (mol/100 mol) of isobutyric (0.94 vs 0.66,P<0.01), isovaleric (1.03 vs 0.65,P<0.01), and valeric acid (1.35 vs 1.11,P= 0.02) were greater for HP than CON. Pre-partum ruminal ammonia decreased (interaction,P<0.010) as parturition approached for HP (11.1 to 9.37 mg/dL) whereas, ammonia was not affected for CON (0.88 to 1.26 mg/dL). Overfeeding MP during late gestation may improve ruminal fermentation pre-partum without affecting DMI or BW change post-partum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology→French-language works237,207→