Hypoxia in Drosophila Embryonic Development: Implications for Organ Preservation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In organ preservation, the prevalent problem has always been time: time to analyze the organ, match the organ to a recipient, store the organ, transport the organ, and transplant the organ. Due to the quick rate at which tissue deteriorates outside the body, whether that be a result of loss of blood flow or cellular damage from the hypothermic method` of storage. The experiment investigates the effect that low oxygen (hypoxia) and low temperature has on the development of embryos as an alternative that may be less detrimental. As demonstrated on the test subject Drosophila melanogaster (fruit flies), both factors can induce a state of suspended animation, which is a condition in which the test subject stops aging during development. Hypoxia can successfully arrest development for up to three times the regular development time, which is around 22 hours at 25°C. At lower temperatures, a greater number of oxygen concentrations are viable and are able to induce suspended animation for a greater period of time. The results of the experiment may suggest that hypoxia is a possible alternative that may extend the time and reduce tissue damage for organ preservation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".