MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2626708008 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2017.2714639

Parallel Electromagnetic Transients Simulation with Shared Memory Architecture Computers

2017· article· en· W2626708008 on OpenAlexaff
Shengtao Fan, Hui Ding, Anuradha Kariyawasam, A.M. Gole

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParallel computingComputer scienceScalabilityInterconnectionDistributed memoryBlock (permutation group theory)DiagonalTransient (computer programming)Admittance parametersComputational scienceShared memoryEngineeringElectrical engineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a graph-based matrix level partitioning methodology for parallel electromagnetic transient (EMT) simulation. By partitioning the graph associated with the admittance matrix, an efficient bordered block diagonal matrix form is obtained, which is particularly suitable for parallel implementation. Even without the presence of distributed transmission lines, fully automatic system partitioning and parallelization of the simulation are achieved. The parallelized algorithm is implemented on a shared memory computer and assessed using two scalable test cases. The first involves an underground cable with many distributed parameter cascaded sections. The second is an interconnection of multiple instances of the IEEE 14-bus system, where only lumped transmission-line models are used. The tests show that EMT simulation can be significantly accelerated. The scalability is tested with up to 64 cores.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power DeliverySame topicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise SuppressionFrench-language works237,207