Ciudadanía sin certezas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La idea de ciudadanía se ha basado en la búsqueda de algo en común, algo que se impone y pauta la existencia personal y social. Este modelo pierde vigencia con la progresiva disolución de las certezas que dictaban los cánones de verdad y bondad. La progresiva desaparición de las seguridades es una liberación que nos obliga a buscar caminos para idear nuevas formas de vida digna. Reconocer la diferencia y la voluntad de diálogo son dinamismos oportunos en un mundo sin seguridades. Dinamismos que pueden manifestarse de modo ejemplar en el trabajo científico y en la política deliberativa. El artículo pone en cuestión este argumento para mostrar cómo las prácticas escolares similares —proyectos de trabajo y asambleas de clase —enseñan cómo vivir sin certezas. Y lo logran cuando el proceso de tutoría refuerza los valores inherentes a este tipo de prácticas. Los autores concluyen afirmando que la ausencia de certezas no significa la falta de compromiso, esperanza y solidaridad.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.034 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".