MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2626734125

What are the Political Chances of Basic Income? Lessons from the Canadian and Dutch Cases

2002· article· en· W2626734125 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yannick Vanderborght

Bibliographic record

VenueRaisons politiques · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Policy and Reform Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBasic incomeContext (archaeology)PoliticsState (computer science)Welfare stateEconomicsWelfareWork (physics)Public economicsLaw and economicsPolitical scienceLawMarket economyComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Is the idea of an unconditional minimum income politically feasible? Is the basic income proposal just another utopian view? Under various forms, the concept has actually been discussed and promoted within the context of welfare state reform, and yet has never been implemented. Beyond specific and contingent obstacles, it seems that an ethical objection acts as a brake upon the introduction of such an income guarantee. As evidenced by the case of Canada and The Netherlands, two countries where the idea has been widely discussed, contemporary welfare state reform processes are not favourable to income security schemes without related work requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.729
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRaisons politiquesSame topicSocial Policy and Reform StudiesFrench-language works237,207