MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2626811319 · doi:10.3917/imin.039.0033

La différence des sexes. L’énigme de l’autre

2017· article· fr· W2626811319 on OpenAlexaff
Gérard Bonnet

Bibliographic record

VenueImaginaire & Inconscient · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsThe Alberta Paraplegic Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyEthnologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A propos de la différence sexuelle, Freud écrit dans l’ Abrégé de psychanalyse : « nous nous trouvons là en face d’une grande énigme, d’un problème posé par un fait biologique ». Le problème vient de ce que le sujet humain est habité par bisexualité psychique et qu’il ne peut se résoudre à cette différence. Dans son article sur La tête de Méduse Freud démontre l’horreur qu’éprouve tout sujet humain à la vision du sexe de l’autre mais aussi la réassurance qui en résulte dès lors qu’il peut l’affronter, car c’est aussi l’occasion d’assumer et de transformer les énigmes inconscientes. Dans Le supplément au voyage de Bougainville, Diderot laisse entendre que cet affrontement prend tout son sens dès lors qu’il est aussi source de fécondité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.501
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.011
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImaginaire & InconscientSame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207