Learning Patch-based Structural Element Models with Hierarchical Palettes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Image patches can be factorized into ‘shapelets’ that describe segmentation patterns, and palettes that describe how to paint the segments. This allows a flexible factorization of local shape (segmentation patterns) and appearance (palettes), which we argue is useful for tasks such as object and scene recognition. Here, we introduce the ‘shapelet’ model- a framework that is able to learn a library of ‘shapelet’ segmentation patterns to capture local shape, and hierarchical palettes of colors to capture appearance. Using a learned shapelet library, image patches can be analyzed using a variational technique to produce descriptors that separately describe local shape and local appearance. These descriptors can be used for high-level vision tasks, such as object and scene recognition. We show that the shapelet model is competitive with SIFT-based methods and structure element (stel) model variants on the object recognition datasets Caltech28 and Caltech101, and the scene recognition dataset All-I-Have-Seen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".