MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2626871350 · doi:10.1109/aero.2017.7943735

Landmark-based optical navigation using nanosatellite star trackers

2017· article· en· W2626871350 on OpenAlexaff
Harry Zhang, Laila Kazemi, John Enright

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceReference frameSatellitePosition (finance)LandmarkComputer visionExtended Kalman filterKalman filterMars Exploration ProgramOrbit determinationFrame (networking)Artificial intelligenceOrbit (dynamics)Filter (signal processing)BitTorrent trackerRemote sensingGeodesyGeographyGlobal Positioning SystemEye trackingPhysicsEngineeringAerospace engineeringAstronomyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines the feasibility of using optical navigation techniques for precision orbit determination. These techniques can provide autonomous and self-contained navigation estimates for satellites orbiting the Earth or other planets such as Mars. Using a combination of identified absolute landmarks and frame-to-frame image features we present an Extended Kalman navigation filter that estimates the satellite's position and velocity. Of particular interest to this study is the filter performance when absolute (e.g., catalog-referenced) landmarks are quite rare. In a reference Mars orbit scenario, our simulations present position errors in the order of tens of kilometers, or better even if absolute measurements are only available every 30 minutes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInertial Sensor and NavigationFrench-language works237,207