MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2626871350 · doi:10.1109/aero.2017.7943735

Landmark-based optical navigation using nanosatellite star trackers

2017· article· en· W2626871350 on OpenAlex
Harry Zhang, Laila Kazemi, John Enright

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceReference frameSatellitePosition (finance)LandmarkComputer visionExtended Kalman filterKalman filterMars Exploration ProgramOrbit determinationFrame (networking)Artificial intelligenceOrbit (dynamics)Filter (signal processing)BitTorrent trackerRemote sensingGeodesyGeographyGlobal Positioning SystemEye trackingPhysicsEngineeringAerospace engineeringAstronomyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines the feasibility of using optical navigation techniques for precision orbit determination. These techniques can provide autonomous and self-contained navigation estimates for satellites orbiting the Earth or other planets such as Mars. Using a combination of identified absolute landmarks and frame-to-frame image features we present an Extended Kalman navigation filter that estimates the satellite's position and velocity. Of particular interest to this study is the filter performance when absolute (e.g., catalog-referenced) landmarks are quite rare. In a reference Mars orbit scenario, our simulations present position errors in the order of tens of kilometers, or better even if absolute measurements are only available every 30 minutes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInertial Sensor and NavigationFrench-language works237,207