Critique de la position conservatrice contre les programmes de création d’emplois
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’auteur critique les trois postulats sur lesquels repose l’idéologie conservatrice en matière de création d’emplois et de promotion économique : les pauvres et les chômeurs ne font pas assez d’efforts pour changer leur situation; l’assistance encourage la paresse et constitue un obstacle à l’autonomie des individus; l’intervention gouvernementale produit inévitablement des effets pervers. Il rappelle que l’histoire récente des politiques sociales a montré que la pauvreté ne peut être éliminée uniquement par des programmes de transferts de revenu. La qualification des individus pour le marché du travail, les programmes de création d’emplois et le système de sécurité sociale doivent faire l’objet d’une politique intégrée. C’est à cette seule condition que pourra être atteint l’objectif de l’égalité des chances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.028 | 0.030 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.032 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".