MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2626973872 · doi:10.3390/s17061420

Fabrication of Circuits on Flexible Substrates Using Conductive SU-8 for Sensing Applications

2017· article· en· W2626973872 on OpenAlexafffund
Carlos D. Gerardo, Edmond Cretu, Robert Rohling

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanomaterials and Printing Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCMC Microsystems
KeywordsMicrofabricationMaterials scienceMiniaturizationFabricationElectrical conductorCapacitorInterconnectionElectronic circuitOptoelectronicsResistorPlanarPrinted circuit boardFlexible electronicsElectroformingInductorLayer (electronics)NanotechnologyElectrical engineeringComputer scienceComposite materialEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article describes a new low-cost rapid microfabrication technology for high-density interconnects and passive devices on flexible substrates for sensing applications. Silver nanoparticles with an average size of 80 nm were used to create a conductive SU-8 mixture with a concentration of wt 25%. The patterned structures after hard baking have a sheet resistance of 11.17 Ω /□. This conductive SU-8 was used to pattern planar inductors, capacitors and interconnection lines on flexible Kapton film. The conductive SU-8 structures were used as a seed layer for a subsequent electroplating process to increase the conductivity of the devices. Examples of inductors, resistor-capacitor (RC) and inductor-capacitor (LC) circuits, interconnection lines and a near-field communication (NFC) antenna are presented as a demonstration. As an example of high-resolution miniaturization, we fabricated microinductors having line widths of 5 μ m. Mechanical bending tests were successful down to a 5 mm radius. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first report of conductive SU-8 used to fabricate such planar devices and the first on flexible substrates. This is a proof of concept that this fabrication approach can be used as an alternative for microfabrication of planar passive devices on flexible substrates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensorsSame topicNanomaterials and Printing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207