Magnetoelastic Analysis of Sandwich Cellular Cylinders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper examines the time-harmonic eigenstrain behavior of a magnetoelastic sandwich cylinder with solid and cellular material layers. A sandwich panel subjected to an external magnetic field is assumed to endure an eigenstrain with a cubic polynomial radial distribution in the sandwich core. Using asymptotic homogenization, the effective material properties of the cellular material are determined as a function of relative density for various cell topologies, that are used in the cellular layers of a cylinder under given magnetic field. Bessel, Struve, and Lommel functions are used to obtain semi-analytic solutions for a sandwich cylinder with perfectly and imperfectly bonded interfaces. The results are first verified with those available in the literature of composite cylinders with solid material layers. Then the paper studies the role that cell topology, relative density, and bonding type at the layer interfaces play on the time-harmonic magnetoelastic responses. The numerical results reveal that the proper choice of relative density, cell topology, and cellular layer configuration can reduce the weight and stress regime, as well as improve the dynamic response of a sandwich cylinder subjected to a given magnetic field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".