A Local-Optimization Emergency Scheduling Scheme With Self-Recovery for a Smart Grid
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the widespread applications of Internet of Things (IoT), the emergency response performance for large-scale network packets is facing serious challenge, especially for renewable distributed energy resources monitoring in a smart grid. Therefore, how to improve the real-time performance of the emergency data packets has been a critical issue. Traditional packet scheduling schemes and topology optimization strategies are not suitable for a large-scale IoT-based smart grid. To address this problem, this paper proposes a new packet scheduling scheme named LOES, which first combines the priority-based packet scheduling scheme with local optimization. We exchange local geographic information to reduce the hop counts and distance between distributed source nodes and sink nodes. Each destination node determines the packet scheduling sequence according to the received emergency information. Finally, we compare LOES with first come first serve, multilevel scheme, and dynamic multilevel priority packet scheduling scheme using packet loss rate, packet waiting time, and average packet end-to-end delay as metrics. The simulation results show that LOES outperforms these previous scheduling schemes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it